- ADVOCACY -- HEALTH CONCERNS
EVRTA home page
55
PLUS SEMINAR
MARK
YOUR CALENDAR!!
Park Place Lodge
Hwy
3, Fernie
October
21st, 10:00 am – 3:00 pm
10:00
am – medication awareness for seniors:
Examine
the potential misuse of medications and learn about how seniors can interact
with doctors and pharmacists to ensure that their medications are wisely used.
12:00
noon – lunch – soup & sandwiches
1:00
pm - doing it your way:
Legal
Documents You Need: Wills, Powers
of Attorney and Representation Agreements. Learn the importance of these
documents in terms of estate planning and security should disability strike.
Cost is $12.95 – includes lunch
Register by October 19th
Contact:
Annette Harrison: 250 423-7192 alharrison@shaw.ca
or
Ray Hughes 250 423-3158 eileenhug@telus.net
Brought
to you by the Council of Senior Citizens’ Organizations of BC and the Elk
Valley Retired Teachers’ Association
*
* * * *
BC Health Coalition website: www.bchealthcoalition.ca
* * * *
This
site has a wealth of information for those with disabilities. The help
sheets are very useful. http://www.bccpd.bc.ca/”
* * * *
- Message
to the Health Minister: Stop the Numbers Game
CCPA-BC Editorial, April 30, 2009
Jeremy Tate and Marcy Cohen
With an election on, it's no surprise that the provincial government is
claiming success on everything from the environment to the economy. But one
area where it hasn't earned bragging rights is seniors' care. The home and
community health-care system that seniors and their families rely on is in
serious decline, thanks to years of poorly planned restructuring and a
failure to maintain (let alone enhance) access to key services as B.C.'s
population ages. The most problematic area of all is long-term care -- often
referred to as residential care or nursing homes.
Before its election in 2001, the government promised to build 5,000 new
non-profit residential care beds within five years. Numbers obtained through
a freedom of information request from the province's health authorities show
that there are fewer residential care beds today than there were in 2001 --
804 fewer, to be precise.
What the province has done is build 4,393 new assisted-living units. Given
that we have lost 804 residential care beds, this works out to 3,589 net new
beds, all of which are assisted living. But that only makes sense if we
assume residential care and assisted living are interchangeable. They
aren't. Assisted living is for seniors who can live quite independently
without 24-hour supervision. Residential care is appropriate for the frail
elderly with "total care" needs and includes 24-hour nursing
supervision. Assisted living is an important part of a continuum of home and
community health care services -- but it is not a substitute for residential
care beds.
Pressed by journalists last week, Health Minister George Abbott admitted the
government has not built the promised residential care beds. However, he
also claimed that our research - published earlier this month in a Canadian
Centre for Policy Alternatives study -- is not to be trusted.
This is a bizarre accusation. Our bed numbers were obtained from the health
authorities and verified with individual facilities.
The Ministry of Health Services, in contrast, reports much higher numbers
because it counts beds that have nothing to do with long-term care for
seniors -- such as adult group homes, mental health facilities, supportive
housing, etc. The misreporting of beds is something the minister should be
called on to explain.
This numbers game is a symptom of much deeper problems in our home and
community health care system. The CCPA is not alone in drawing attention to
these problems. The B.C. Medical Association, the auditor-general and the
B.C. Care Providers Association have all raised concerns recently about the
deteriorating state of seniors' care. Today, B.C. has the lowest access to
residential care of any province other than New Brunswick (access means the
number of beds per 1,000 seniors aged 75 and older.)
Access to home support has dropped since 2001 -- by a substantial 30 per
cent (these are personal care services provided in seniors' homes, such as
help with bathing and medications). Access to home nursing also dropped, by
11 per cent. Only access to community rehabilitation has seen an increase,
up 24 per cent.
The province's way of dealing with inadequate service levels has been to
limit eligibility to those seniors with higher-level needs. As a result, the
vital prevention and early intervention role of home and community health
care is undermined. The government's failure to maintain (let alone
increase) access levels means many seniors have to rely on family members
for care or simply go without.
Too often, seniors living at home get access to the residential and other
community health services they need only after being admitted to hospital.
Being in hospital is hard on the frail elderly. It blocks beds that could be
used by other patients who genuinely require acute care services. And it's
extremely expensive.
Providing effective community-based health care to seniors is not an
impossible challenge. Adequate funding is an important part of the solution,
but so is better coordination of services. A number of successful and
innovative programs are in place in communities across B.C. These programs
bring different care providers together to better coordinate, monitor and
deliver care to the frail elderly. While these innovations hold much
promise, they remain at the margins -- isolated pockets of excellence in the
midst of a home and community care system that is largely in decline. If
they are to make a difference, they will need to be scaled up and introduced
provincewide.
What we need in this election is not more hot air about bed numbers. We need
leadership and a commitment to transparency, public consultation, good
planning and increased access to seniors' care.
Jeremy Tate is a former director of health facilities planning at the
Capital Regional District in Victoria. Marcy Cohen is a research associate
with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.